23 replies to this topic

[Clandestine]

which is better?

[MK_LAGI]

i chose photobucket coz u can organize everythign into albums and stuff

[AnDy89]

glad neither is winning

url removed please don't troll others topics

Edited by Donna, 14 December 2005 - 05:37 PM.

[Jamie Huskisson]

neither

[Clandestine]

those choosing neither, what would you recommend for hosting images

thanks

[Jamie Huskisson]

your own host

free image hosts die too easily for my liking...

[Vouksh]

Jay said:

your own host

free image hosts die too easily for my liking...

Same. I hate using free hosts because they always delete your image if it uses too much bandwidth. Just upload it via FTP and share away.

Edited by Vouksh, 14 December 2005 - 10:07 PM.

[Jeepinator]

Imageshack hasn't deleted one of my images yet. It still has the first sig I ever made on there. It's not fast sometimes, it seems to lag real bad occasionally. It would be better to get a small amount of webspace and use that.

[Cheyne]

I have only ever used imageshack, and that's because the only time I need free image hosting is like for slamm images t post here and there, so it doesn't matter how long it's there for.

[Mooey]

Free hosting seems bogged down with adverts which might put clients off because it cheapens how your work looks.

I find clicking on a free host link is slooooow, even on a 2mb connection.

[Bryn]

I imageshack, its so quick.

[slack3r08]

i haven´t used imageshack but photobucket has done the job for me ..

[funkysoul]

neither... own hosting is still more reliable

[Tasha]

I use imageshack a lot, photobucket occassionally, but I would agree your own hosting is better, so neither!

[jonno]

i use FLICKR unfortunatle you do have to have a yahoo account or sign up to yahoo email but you can store thousands of pictures and even more if you go pro

[Silwolffe]

I had my own host and I hosted my images off of there, however I didn't pay the annual fee and it has been suspended...

Right now, I use Image Shack beacuse it's easier and it doesn't automatically resize your photos like photobucket.

As soon as I have saved up enough, I am going to get my webserver back. Having my own server to host my stuff, I feel is much more reliable.

[meadow]

Your own hosting is best, but I still use imageshack for the odd things. My web hosting package has just giuven me and extra 900 megs free though so I use that instead.

[coolaid]

photobucket is better cause i get the feeling it'll last longer than imageshack

[kneax]

ImageShack forever :wub:

[Jdz]

ImageShack - Fast and Convient.