4 replies to this topic

[artcoder]

If I am interested in increasing the Google PR of the site http://www.mysite.com would it be better to have people link to the site with ...

<a href="http://mysite.com">mysite.com</a>

Or would this be better...

<a href="http://mysite.com">Find RSS Feeds</a>

The first will get the name out to people. But the second is more optized for search engines, I think. By using the second method, search engines will start associating search terms "Find RSS" with the site iGliss.com. Is that correct?

Edited by Donna, 18 December 2005 - 08:44 PM.

[Cheyne]

Yeah, that's correct.

Both links are good for PR, however the second one is better if you want to be listed in search engines when people search Find RSS Feeds.

I would go with the second one.

[NGPixel]

The best option would be to use an alt to define the content.

yoursite.com

[Jamie Huskisson]

NGPixel, on Dec 19 2005, 02:22 AM, said:

The best option would be to use an alt to define the content.

<a href="yoursite.com" alt="RSS Feeds">yoursite.com</a>

I think he means <a href="http://www.yoursite.com/" title="Some text here to explain the link">Some text here to describe again (very short)</a>

[NGPixel]

lol yea, thanks Jay, "alt" is for images....