60 replies to this topic

[Will0wz]

Who do you think are the most active members on P2L..

Personally off the top of my head i think the likes of.

• Zero.dub
  
• Bug
  
• Propax
  
• Creative Insanity
  
• Donna
  
• Faken
  
• Mr.Matt
  
• Will0wz
  
• Matthew.
  
• S0LDIER.

Are the most active members which i see on here everyday..

Edited by Will0wz, 18 June 2007 - 08:16 AM.

[bobbobicus]

agree with that list.

[Will0wz]

Do you think i am included in there

[Matthew.]

I think you have to appreciate the difference between activeness and just posting a fair bit. People like rc69 should be on that list simply because he's around most days and does a lot in the help section but only posts 1/2 times a day recently

[Will0wz]

im only doing the list depending on who i see the most and who i believe posts the most.. Thats what defines an active member.

[Matthew.]

True true, I'm not a fan of post counts so my definition will always include how much someone contributes to a topic or forum from the contents of a post but yeah I'm not disagreeing with the list (with the exception of perhaps RMGR? )

[Will0wz]

maybe rmgr should be removed and i shuld be in there

[Archangel]

If you're basing it solely off post counts then just check out the "Today's top 20" link every day.

But I agree with Matthew that it's more than just post count, it's the quality of the post as well.

I've noticed people such as rc69 (to take the example from above) are VERY helpful with the "help" forums. And some of their responses take a LOT more time then my "Welcome to P2L" posts.

[Will0wz]

true say guys....

[Av-]

I once again feel left out

[Will0wz]

haha, i rarely see u posting!! i didn't mention to post ur own list! wht do u think guys

[Stu]

i'd go with that list, but i'd also agree with matt.

[Will0wz]

[CrazedLlama]

Umm, what about me? GRR

List is pretty fine.

[Pax]

I'd say its quality of the posts, rather than post count. Post count doesn't mean a whole lot IMO. It's not hard to spam a forum but like was mentioned above with rc69 helping people...thats what counts, and I'm sure that kind of work gets people coming back to the p2l forums...not so much the Mountain Dew Party Room "bump the post count" threads.....

[Donna]

Matthew., on Jun 18 2007, 06:12 AM, said:

I think you have to appreciate the difference between activeness and just posting a fair bit. People like rc69 should be on that list simply because he's around most days and does a lot in the help section but only posts 1/2 times a day recently

I agree with what your saying but all the Staff are active, rc69 is always active in php and help topics even before he became Staff he was. I answer more PM's that what I post.

Will0wz, on Jun 18 2007, 06:13 AM, said:

im only doing the list depending on who i see the most and who i believe posts the most.. Thats what defines an active member.

Post counts mean nothing, we have a lot more active members than your list states. Your forgetting all the stuff you cannot see all the tutorial submitters, personal messages, emails and the background work that keeps this site going.

[Will0wz]

Donna, on Jun 18 2007, 05:44 PM, said:

Matthew., on Jun 18 2007, 06:12 AM, said:

I think you have to appreciate the difference between activeness and just posting a fair bit. People like rc69 should be on that list simply because he's around most days and does a lot in the help section but only posts 1/2 times a day recently

I agree with what your saying but all the Staff are active, rc69 is always active in php and help topics even before he became Staff he was. I answer more PM's that what I post.

Will0wz, on Jun 18 2007, 06:13 AM, said:

im only doing the list depending on who i see the most and who i believe posts the most.. Thats what defines an active member.

Post counts mean nothing, we have a lot more active members than your list states. Your forgetting all the stuff you cannot see all the tutorial submitters, personal messages, emails and the background work that keeps this site going.

You are right there but im only talking bout the dudes who post

[Matthew.]

Donna, on Jun 18 2007, 05:44 PM, said:

Matthew., on Jun 18 2007, 06:12 AM, said:

I think you have to appreciate the difference between activeness and just posting a fair bit. People like rc69 should be on that list simply because he's around most days and does a lot in the help section but only posts 1/2 times a day recently

I agree with what your saying but all the Staff are active, rc69 is always active in php and help topics even before he became Staff he was. I answer more PM's that what I post.

I was trying to say rc69 should be on the list (or rather recognised for being active) What did you think i meant?

edit: How many PMs do you get

Edited by Matthew., 18 June 2007 - 11:59 AM.

[Donna]

having probs with buttons Matthew. lol

exactly as i replied btw I know what you mean't.

[CAMILLUS]

yes the list is indeed nice and true

hehe..