How's this one?
Started by pbfanatic, Aug 14 2007 05:07 PM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 14 August 2007 - 05:07 PM
How is this one? 
#2
Posted 14 August 2007 - 06:58 PM
Emmm, don't liking this one. Need more effects, change the text, and the render is hide, read some tuts m8.
#3
Posted 14 August 2007 - 08:02 PM
Well that was brutally honest. lol Specifically what don't you like about the render?
#4
Posted 15 August 2007 - 12:28 AM
Comments generally seem mean but they are given in good intentions. I don't like how the pixels scattered around are in some areas blurred. Try to make them a little bit more sharp. If the pixels looked more like sand it would match better. (on photoshop)Try making a new layer, and do image>apply image. Then do filter>ocean ripple. Next, press ctrl+F two times. Then erase the parts that arn't supposed to look like sand, like the face of the render. Also you might want to try filter>sharpen.
#5
Posted 15 August 2007 - 01:00 AM
Thanks Mehhht. For both the comments and thing thing about the comments themselves.
After hearing you speak of sand I thought I should link back to where I got the original photo for the editing. It is not sand but dirty dirty water.

Can you give me advice on maybe how I should have went about using the photo? I would like to improve. Thanks again for the comments.
After hearing you speak of sand I thought I should link back to where I got the original photo for the editing. It is not sand but dirty dirty water.

Can you give me advice on maybe how I should have went about using the photo? I would like to improve. Thanks again for the comments.
#6
Posted 15 August 2007 - 02:02 AM
Although it's a neat looking image (kind of)
I don't think it will work well in a sig (unless you're amazing)
Your render should be more clear. See, the problem is that you're only showing part of the 'dirty water', so the viewer has no idea what you're showing!
I thought you had a render covered up by tire tracks/sand until seeing the original :\
I don't think it will work well in a sig (unless you're amazing)
Your render should be more clear. See, the problem is that you're only showing part of the 'dirty water', so the viewer has no idea what you're showing!
I thought you had a render covered up by tire tracks/sand until seeing the original :\
#7
Posted 15 August 2007 - 01:10 PM
Yeah, your bes bet would be to find a better picture.
#8
Posted 15 August 2007 - 01:17 PM
Sounds good. So like in the signature I'm using now. The photo I got it from. I was able to take the person away from the background. Thats what I want. To get rid of the other stuff so I can actualyl work with it.
Thanks guys.
I understand I didn't post the one I'm using in here. But can you give any comments or suggestions on that one please? I didn't really get many comments on it.
Thanks again!
Thanks guys.
I understand I didn't post the one I'm using in here. But can you give any comments or suggestions on that one please? I didn't really get many comments on it.
Thanks again!
#9
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:26 PM
Well now i see its not ur fault, the render sux.
#10
Posted 16 August 2007 - 05:41 PM
Well for your current sig it needs more effects. Take out the scanlines also. Try blending the render into the effects also.
#11
Posted 16 August 2007 - 05:42 PM
Its to messy.
To look at all I see is a big BLUR.
Make it more pronounced
To look at all I see is a big BLUR.
Make it more pronounced
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
