Jump to content


No more Internet?


10 replies to this topic

#1 EAXT

    P2L Paramedic

  • Publishing Betazoids
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,101 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 November 2007 - 10:27 PM

Quote

Consumer and corporate use of the Internet could overload the current capacity and lead to brown-outs in two years unless backbone providers invest billions of dollars in new infrastructure, according to a study released Monday.

A flood of new video and other Web content could overwhelm the Internet by 2010 unless backbone providers invest up to US$137 billion in new capacity, more than double what service providers plan to invest, according to the study, by Nemertes Research Group, an independent analysis firm. In North America alone, backbone investments of $42 billion to $55 billion will be needed in the next three to five years to keep up with demand, Nemertes said.

The study is the first to “apply Moore’s Law (or something very like it) to the pace of application innovation on the ‘Net,” the study says. “Our findings indicate that although core fiber and switching/routing resources will scale nicely to support virtually any conceivable user demand, Internet access infrastructure, specifically in North America, will likely cease to be adequate for supporting demand within the next three to five years.”

The study confirms long-time concerns of the Internet Innovation Alliance (IIA), an advocacy group focused on upgrading U.S. broadband networks, said Bruce Mehlman, co-chairman of the group. The group, with members including AT&T, Level 3 Communications, Corning, Americans for Tax Reform and the American Council of the Blind, has been warning people of the coming “exaflood” of video and other Web content that could clog its pipes.

The study gives “good, hard, unique data” on the IIA concerns about network capacity, Mehlman said. The Nemertes study suggests demand for Web applications such as streaming and interactive video, peer-to-peer file transfers and music downloads will accelerate, creating a demand for more capacity. Close to three-quarters of U.S. Internet users watched an average of 158 minutes of video in May and viewed more than 8.3 billion video streams, according to research from comScore, an analysis group.

Internet users will create 161 exabytes of new data this year, and this exaflood is a positive development for Internet users and businesses, IIA says. An exabyte is 1 quintillion bytes or about 1.1 billion gigabytes. One exabyte is the equivalent of about 50,000 years of DVD quality video.

Carriers and policy makers need to be aware of this demand, Mehlman added.

“Video has unleased an explosion of Internet content,” Mehlman said. “We think the exaflood is generally not well understood, and its investment implications not well defined.”

The responsibility for keeping up with this growing demand lies with backbone providers and national policy makers, added Mehlman, also executive director of the Technology CEO Council, a trade group, and a former assistant secretary of technology policy in the U.S. Department of Commerce.

“It takes a digital village,” he said. “Certainly, infrastructure providers have plenty to do. You’ve seen billions in investment, and you’re seeing ongoing billions more.”

U.S. lawmakers can also help in several ways, he said. For example, the U.S. Congress could require that home contractors who receive government assistance for building affordable housing include broadband connections in their houses, he said. Congress could also provide tax credits to help broadband providers add more capacity, he said.

Consumers also pay high taxes for telecommunication services, averaging about 13 percent on some telecom services, similar to the tax rate on tobacco and alcohol, Mehlman said. One tax on telecom service has remained in place since the 1898 Spanish-American War, when few U.S. residents had telephones, he noted.

“We think it’s a mistake to treat telecom like a luxury and tax it like a sin,” he said.

By Grant Gross, IDG News Service

Source: MAC World [to view original article, click here]




Well... what do you think :) ? lol

#2 N-sane Noob

    Noob Leader

  • Publishing Betazoids
  • PipPipPip
  • 873 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Taking over stuff

Posted 20 November 2007 - 10:33 PM

Who the hell gets that kind of idea. If anything about Internet, there will be more and more.

#3 Zelphics

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 34 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 20 November 2007 - 10:47 PM

I don't think so =p

#4 NGPixel

    Senior Programmer

  • P2L Staff
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,410 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Montreal, Canada
  • Interests:Web Design : Coding : Animation

Posted 20 November 2007 - 11:55 PM

don't think this will ever be a problem. Internet2 was 8.8GB/sec in 2006 and now at 100GB/sec. Adding more backbone capacity is not really a problem...

#5 Dilfill

    Jedi In Training

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 380 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:PHOTOSHOP!

Posted 20 November 2007 - 11:58 PM

omg thats stupid. that wont happen...

#6 Jeepinator

    The Jeepinator

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 721 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tennessee, USA

Posted 20 November 2007 - 11:58 PM

How would the Internet be overwhelmed and shut down? It is not maintained on any single system. It is self expanding and millions are responsible for its maintenance. It's not going down any time soon.

#7 SebLev

    Forum Whore is what I am today!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,514 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, ON, Canada

Posted 21 November 2007 - 12:17 AM

yeah I really don't think that will happen...

#8 Lastcrime

    Impatient Jedi that likes to eat cereal

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 649 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Interests:Soccer, Snowboarding, Hockey, B-ball, Skateboarding, Computers!

Posted 21 November 2007 - 03:37 PM

heard something like this on the news this morning, its not gonna completely disappear but because its growing so fast, speeds are going to be reduced and downloading will be a lot slower.

#9 l3lueMage

    Wanna Be Moderator

  • Publishing Betazoids
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,596 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Francisco Bay Area

Posted 21 November 2007 - 04:14 PM

Nah none of it is true, They just need more powerplant thingies ;) Thats it lol. And where does this apply to? lol the whole world? xD Cause I hardly doubt that's even possible, even if it's just for the US or UK or wherever....Meh it's just not going to happen, go get some solar panels lol.

#10 EAXT

    P2L Paramedic

  • Publishing Betazoids
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,101 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 November 2007 - 10:15 PM

it's the end of the world... sure... no more P2L!

#11 vvtopkar

    P2L Jedi

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 532 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:3rd Planet from the Sun

Posted 21 November 2007 - 11:36 PM

thats MAC WORLD for ya (first they think pcs are crap, then they think the internet will diminish! what crazy idea will they come up with next!?)
;)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users