I have a paper I have to write on Global Warning so I thought I would take a survey on if you think its all real or a false production. Please vote! It will help me alot!!!!
Edited by Dilfill, 03 January 2008 - 08:53 PM.
Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:41 PM
Edited by Dilfill, 03 January 2008 - 08:53 PM.
Posted 03 January 2008 - 05:16 PM
Edited by Matthew., 03 January 2008 - 05:18 PM.
Posted 03 January 2008 - 05:51 PM
Posted 03 January 2008 - 06:13 PM
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:08 PM
Somehow Donna managed to half-convince me that it wasn't real, and was all a politics game - then some other people started to think the same thing around me... so I'm half and half not sure.
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:18 PM
Posted 03 January 2008 - 08:37 PM
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:08 PM
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:14 PM
FALSE: the oceans will not get higher levels and citys won't be flooded by water.
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:47 PM
The 'situation' is dramatised Yes, Matheus, but I would like an explanation of this:
FALSE: the oceans will not get higher levels and citys won't be flooded by water.
If ice caps are melting as you say, then water levels will inherently rise...it's the nature of the beast. You cannot put an icecube into a cup of water, watch it melt and expect there to be the same amount of water in the cup as before.
As for your 2nd false, I have nothing to back me up here but the argument I would make (and I say this hypothetically) is that changes in history have been over a greater time scale than what were considering if global warming does indeed exist, there is a limit to nature adaptability and indeed to an extent that statement is void by what has already happening even on a small scale.
Just my 3AM thoughts
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:44 PM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 07:06 AM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:52 AM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 10:33 AM
The weather is certainly changing but I personally believe we are in the tip of a long cycle. Funnily enough I was discussing this on the way home in the car lol. Anyways, you guys know what periodic graphs look like? For those of you that don't, this is a periodic graph (they are used to tell tide height, etc)
Imagine that without the math part, I beleive we are nearing the top of the curve, and it will take millions and millions of years for us to reach the bottom again, hence the Ice Age. I don't think humans could have that much of an impact on the enviroment. It is just a life cycle but people are comparing it to 70 yr old's stories, when in reality, 70 years is nothing compared to millions and millions of years. This is my theory anyway, anyone agree?
Beret.
Edited by Jeepinator, 04 January 2008 - 11:59 AM.
Posted 04 January 2008 - 11:31 AM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 06:42 PM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:21 PM
Thanks alot guys I get it alot now! sorry for using you guys lol
I feel so abused!
lol, no problemo!
Posted 05 January 2008 - 02:59 AM
Posted 05 January 2008 - 03:45 AM
Glad I could help, also its nice to see some people share the same view on the 'cycle' theory with me
((Out of interest, are you going to use it? I'm wondering if its plausible enough to reach an essay page ))
Thanks,
Beret.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users