Jump to content


layout dimensions


12 replies to this topic

#1 daveberg

    Jedi In Training

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 434 posts
  • Interests:My pc of course!!<br /><br />Love photoshop, flash, and dreamweaver!!<br /><br />Other than that, it's the same old, out with the lads down the pub, back home to the mrs once my money runs out.....

Posted 05 April 2005 - 10:10 AM

Just looking to make a fresh website, was wondering what would be the ideal dimensions to use so the page would display well on most resolutions....?

(yes i'm a noob :( )

#2 maansson

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 132 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lund, Sweden
  • Interests:Hmm, not much for Photoshop. Havn't taking time to learn it yet. Use Fireworks to the graphical area. More into coding and stuff. PHP, CSS, Java and of course HTML.

Posted 05 April 2005 - 11:33 AM

Most users have a resolution of 1024x768 pixels. So you can eaasily have up to 1000px in width. But a lot of people have even higher resolutions than 1024. So dont make your width 100%. It will only be streched too much i.e. < 1280. And don't have the site more than 2-3 screen pages long. To much to scroll, and read.

Sincerily yours,
maansson

#3 Jaymz

    Retired P2L Staff

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,104 posts

Posted 05 April 2005 - 03:04 PM

maansson, on Apr 5 2005, 12:33 PM, said:

Most users have a resolution of 1024x768 pixels.
State your source? This Site says that 800x600 is. I don't see the problem with stretching layouts, in fact my site uses them and I've yet to hear a complaint...

#4 designkai

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 145 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 05 April 2005 - 06:06 PM

it depends on your preferance, i usually go with eather 740 or full screen. 740 because it fits onto those 800*600 screens, and leaves space for the scroll bar and a little background image/colour.

Lol, i learnt that from jaymz

#5 CoryMathews

    P2L Jedi

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 554 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 05 April 2005 - 07:43 PM

i always do 775x575 idk y just always do. of course the 575 is likely to get larger if needbe.

#6 daveberg

    Jedi In Training

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 434 posts
  • Interests:My pc of course!!<br /><br />Love photoshop, flash, and dreamweaver!!<br /><br />Other than that, it's the same old, out with the lads down the pub, back home to the mrs once my money runs out.....

Posted 06 April 2005 - 05:12 AM

Thanks for the info people. Appreciated. :P

#7 maansson

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 132 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lund, Sweden
  • Interests:Hmm, not much for Photoshop. Havn't taking time to learn it yet. Use Fireworks to the graphical area. More into coding and stuff. PHP, CSS, Java and of course HTML.

Posted 06 April 2005 - 02:00 PM

Jaymz, on Apr 5 2005, 10:04 PM, said:

State your source? This Site says that 800x600 is. I don't see the problem with stretching layouts, in fact my site uses them and I've yet to hear a complaint...
This site shows that more than 60% uses 1024. The stats comes from the nedstats own website. I'd trust their stats. Who will look at our webpages. Other webdesigners. Who looks at nedstat. Yes, webdesigners. See a pattern?

#8 Jaymz

    Retired P2L Staff

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 4,104 posts

Posted 06 April 2005 - 04:02 PM

It depends, according to my own observations, about 90% of my customers are on 800x600, because it comes standard on most pc's. I retract my earlier statement, it's best to tailor to your audience :)

#9 Donna

    Retired P2L Queen!

  • P2L Staff
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 12,330 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:B.C Canada

Posted 06 April 2005 - 04:14 PM

maansson, on Apr 6 2005, 07:00 PM, said:

Jaymz, on Apr 5 2005, 10:04 PM, said:

State your source? This Site says that 800x600 is. I don't see the problem with stretching layouts, in fact my site uses them and I've yet to hear a complaint...
This site shows that more than 60% uses 1024. The stats comes from the nedstats own website. I'd trust their stats. Who will look at our webpages. Other webdesigners. Who looks at nedstat. Yes, webdesigners. See a pattern?
Better site to go by
http://www.w3schools...wsers_stats.asp

It also states:

Quote

Statistics Are Often Misleading
You cannot - as a web developer - rely only on statistics. Statistics can often be misleading.

Global averages may not always be relevant to your web site. Different sites attract different audiences. Some web sites attract professional developers using professional hardware, other sites attract hobbyists using older low spec computers.

Also be aware that  many stats may have an incomplete or faulty browser detection. It is quite common by many web stats report programs, not to detect new browsers like Opera and Netscape 6 or 7 from the web log.


#10 CoryMathews

    P2L Jedi

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 554 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 06 April 2005 - 05:32 PM

you say whatever percent views at 1024x768 well then if it was designed for 800x600 it would still look fine at 1024x768 so y not make it good for both and go with a little less then 800x600?

#11 young2k4

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Digital Art

Posted 07 April 2005 - 03:59 AM

hey i tend to use width="750" and Height="600" ish, just the style of site yah wantin realli.

#12 maansson

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 132 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lund, Sweden
  • Interests:Hmm, not much for Photoshop. Havn't taking time to learn it yet. Use Fireworks to the graphical area. More into coding and stuff. PHP, CSS, Java and of course HTML.

Posted 07 April 2005 - 07:40 AM

If you use a static high, then you almost bounded to iframes. And iframes suck!

If you use a higher resolution than the minority 800x600 users (29% according to Donnas suggested site) maybe they will change their mind and oick a higher resolution. Who today have a monitor or graphic card that does't support 1024. That can only be like 5% or less. I can't understand how people even can use 800. Everything is so big! So if they can't see the site properly they either horisontal scroll or change their resolution. See it as a mission to convince everyone that they should use >=1024. Look at P2L. Like 1000px wide. That's the spirit!

Sincerely yours,
maansson

#13 daveberg

    Jedi In Training

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 434 posts
  • Interests:My pc of course!!<br /><br />Love photoshop, flash, and dreamweaver!!<br /><br />Other than that, it's the same old, out with the lads down the pub, back home to the mrs once my money runs out.....

Posted 07 April 2005 - 11:22 AM

Thanks for the feedback people, think i'll go with the 1000...... :)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users