How to get TRAFFIC on your new site.
#21
Posted 23 July 2005 - 10:58 AM
External links are THE most important factors taken into consideration by google. The more external links you have and the heigher their Google PageRank, the better your ranking will be. I knew the Google formula at some point, but I can't seem to remember it now Anyway it's somewhere on www.google.com, but I'm to lazy to check
Other useful SEO tips for your website:
Add a sitemap - it's easier for google bots to crawl through them
Keyword density - Have a good keyword density but don't go over the edge. A paragraph about treadmills can't go: "treadmills are good exercise machines, but the best treadmill around is a treadmill called the PG treadmill, which is the fastest treadmill in the whole treadmill industry"....not only will your articles make no sense, but you might get banned too(probably will if you copy that piece of crap I just wrote ) . A good keyword density for a page is around 15-20%, using 4-5 keywords.
Titles are also important - have a relevant title but don't write whole stories on it...try to include 2-3 important keywords in the first 10 words of your title.
And I could go on an on, but I'm noticing that this reply is almost a new tutorial
Cheers and thnx Faken for the insight
#22
Posted 15 March 2006 - 09:55 PM
#23
Posted 16 March 2006 - 01:55 AM
#24
Posted 16 March 2006 - 11:19 AM
#25
Posted 22 March 2006 - 10:51 PM
#26
Posted 14 May 2006 - 08:40 PM
#27
Posted 13 June 2006 - 08:30 AM
I.e for my site they are Cost effective web design, Free, Lookingsharp, Members and Home.
The keywords i had actually set are Cost effective, Cost effective web design, Web design and ecommerce.
A small little trick is use keywords in your title, Its a rare known fact that alot of search engines base your keywords almost entirely on your title
<title>Lookingsharp.co.uk - Cost effective web design</title>
Also always include ror feeds and sitemaps where ever possible.
A small little trick i use is embedded code, and image urls. For example i have <link ref... (blah blah) ../ror.xml> under my <title></title> tags, and image links to both ror.xml and Sitemap.xml. It means that the search engines spiral my website.
Meaning they first read the embedded tag (ror.xml), they list all of the links listed in there, begin to crawl the rest of my site and then get redirected via the image link back to my ror.xml and with the addition of my sitemap.xml causing them to spiral my site. This ensures All of my links are read.
Its also a good idea to setup a cron job to auto update your sites ror and sitemap feeds.
Hope it helps further.
As for the link exchanges, ill happily exchange links with any one
Edited by Danny, 13 June 2006 - 08:31 AM.
#28
Posted 07 August 2006 - 06:51 PM
#29
Posted 10 August 2006 - 08:06 AM
#30
Posted 12 August 2006 - 12:44 AM
Search for "swift tutorials" on google and you'll notice that P2L is the first result.
Here's the displayed result record:
Swift 3D Tutorials - Pixel2LifeSwift 3D Tutorials. Pixel2life is the largest tutorial search engine on the internet catering to graphic designers and programmers.
www.pixel2life.com/tutorials/Swift_3D/All/?PHPSESSID=cff5b7a443f0c353bc254dadc671b833 - 73k - Cached - Similar pages
If we look at that, you will see this...
Pixel2LifeSwift 3D Tutorials. Pixel2life is the largest tutorial search engine on the internet catering to graphic designers and programmers.
That's from the meta keys...
Dan
#31
Posted 12 August 2006 - 10:09 AM
lol (dont ask me how he did it.. he was ranked 8,000 on alexa at one point though..)
#32
Posted 11 November 2006 - 01:12 AM
#33
Posted 28 November 2006 - 06:23 AM
#34
Posted 29 November 2006 - 08:14 PM
#35
Posted 30 November 2006 - 12:48 AM
#36
Posted 30 November 2006 - 01:29 AM
Didn't read it all, but i'm sure it's a nice article. Should the title perhaps be "How to get TRAFFIC to your new site."?
Then maybe you should read the article instead of worrying about the topic title.
#37
Posted 09 December 2006 - 07:59 AM
#38
Posted 02 May 2007 - 09:49 AM
#39 _*Creative Insanity_*
Posted 14 June 2007 - 02:37 AM
Just goes to show totally different results from the same process. P2L excels and mine still suffers (mind you only been a year so early days).
But yeah I am rather stunned that 2 people at separate sides of the world can come up with the same tactics.
Just look at my sig.. hehe (the green one).
#40
Posted 23 June 2007 - 01:00 PM
Thanks.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users