5 replies to this topic

[nightfale]

They are in order of when I made them :] My first few sucked.
FYI I use gimp. :D






Yes I know I shouldn't of covered the render.

[xboomcazoox]

Well, i don't want you to take this the wrong way but TBH (to be honest) your sig lack depth, the text doesn't flow with the sig, and it looks like you just plopped some text and a render over a bg.

But the one i think looks really good is the eternal sig, though there is soo much empty/plain space it makes up for it with the depth and blur of the focal.

[TRF]

The text doesn't work all that well with the images. But the images are great. They are bright, clean, and colorful. It's really just the text. And some of the blank space you've left in one or two of the signatures.

[Bluediamond]

The sigs could be nice but there's too much mess in each of them. You hardly understand what you're actually seeing.
The "Shoot for the Moon" could have been very nice if it had been more sober, with less drawing all around. The black long-haired girl on the green background looks nice, however.

[hunnydesigns]

I like it! its your vision... nothing wrong with it. Good job.

[TRF]

I just realized that the blank space in your "Eternal" sig was there to give the illusion that she's popping out of the signature. Good idea. The only problem with this is that part of her head is cropped off on the right side of the signature. This breaks the illusion, because it's showing people that there is, in fact, a border.