26 replies to this topic

[CoryMathews]

he was found not guilty on all 10 accounts. he is free at last to go rape some more lil kids. our law system has once again freed another famous person. ...all men are created equal....

[syndrome]

Without going into too much detail i think the verdict was wrong and he did all those things, like Cory said its because hes famous

[jonno]

i cant believe hes been let off, jeez, how retarded are the flippin jury? even though everyone said he gave that kid booze he got let off with that aswel?? what the hell is the world coming to?

[Donna]

CoryMathews, on Jun 13 2005, 09:34 PM, said:

he was found not guilty on all 10 accounts. he is free at last to go rape some more lil kids. our law system has once again freed another famous person.  ...all men are created equal....

In the early beginnings along with everyone else I thought he was guilty but after reading all the evidence there was nothing there from the start.

There was no evidence just a dying kid with cancer, his bro & his money hungry mother and a prosecutor with a vendetta, all looking for a quick get rich life nothing else.

I'm really glad their little conspiracy plan failed them.

But saying for him to go and rape more kids is a little harsh considering he never harmed any child in the first place, maybe when your more mature and you get labelled with being a child molester you may understand it.

[MalDON]

Nobody will ever know for sure. He could have, and he could not have. Remember, the law system is corrupt.

[Regulus]

2 things:

1. REALLY bad juries
2. Bribery

And doesn't it seem odd that he was found non-guilty in ALL 10 courts? Methinks something is up...

Edited by Regulus, 13 June 2005 - 09:01 PM.

[Donna]

Regulus, on Jun 14 2005, 02:00 AM, said:

2 things:

1.  REALLY bad juries
2.  Bribery

And doesn't it seem odd that he was found non-guilty in ALL 10 courts?  Methinks something is up...

Forgetting parents who cynically tried to use their childs condition as a lever to get Michael to give them money.

You go to court guilty until proved innocent, in this case there was nothing to prove him as being guilty because there was no evidence and the media loves to throw stuff at us to make us all believe its true and just like sheep we believe it.

That family are known for this, do some reading up on them the father was persistent in begging celebrities for money after Gavin was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer in 2000 also the kid took acting lessons. He also confessed he lied and well his mother is just a joke.

[Faken]

Sorry, but this trial was doomed from the get go... the more the mother opened her mouth, the better she made MJ look. Anyone who thought a guilty verdict would be returned was fooling themselves and then some. This case had zero chance from the get go.

Faken

[Donna]

Speed, on Jun 14 2005, 03:44 AM, said:

Donna isnt it you go to court innocent until proven guilty by the court of law?

Yes I see I typed it the other way I mean't the other way around, I type too fast sometimes.

[coolaid]

there is a possibility he never did those things anway. maybe he did just really love people and want to be everyones friend... aww who am i kiddin..

[syntex]

This was by far the stupidest trial ever,I mean ur trying to get the most famous pop-star sued...
Its crazy you will never win

[D-Cal]

Thank you, Donna!

That poor guy is a victim of his own nievety, sure, but he's not a monster.
I can't believe how flawed the entire case has been.
It should have been thrown out of court on the first day.

Those Arvizo morons should be sent to prison for 20 years, instead of Jacko.
They were perfectly happy to lie through their teeth, knowing that an innocent man would spend the next 20 years in prison for it, just because he made the mistake of paying off the last false accusation.

I find it impossible to believe Michael capable even of thinking that way, let alone abusing anyone.

He thinks he's still 10. Did anything like that ever cross your mind when you were 10? I doubt it.

I'm very glad he's been acquitted. He didn't deserve that.

[oliver.m]

I agree Donna,

The parents just wanted money, they tell their child to say that Michael Jackson raped them and then of course the child will because he knows if his parents win the case he will get a nice new house and a nice car and lots of new toys etc. I think its good that he has been found not guilty and hope he doesnt have to go through anything like that again just because some parents want to get rich quick.

[Jamie Huskisson]

hes innocent until proven innocent

those where the words of the MJ fans banners, and those where the words that i believed to be true..

those saying "omfg th0se l33t sk1lls 0f th3 jury s0x0rs, need to look at the evidence, there was none

and here comes the trademark..
"go back to school"

[D-Cal]

Right on, Jay.

I just read the jury notes, and the first thing they did was to look at the case irrespectively of Michael, and treat it as they would any other.

The jury saw Mrs Arvizo as a scam, and that's exactly what she is.
There was no evidence against him whatsoever, except word against word.

Who in the right mind would send their kids to someone's place, knowing that he had been accused of these things before?
She knew very well that the original allegations were as false as these, and she admitted that she had lied under oath already.
She also trained her kids to lie under oath, for which they should all be punished. Severely.

Even with a unanimous 'Not Guilty', that family has damaged his career massively, and he had to cancel a tour because of it.
He's lost millions of dollars, his reputation is in tatters, and now he has to sell his ranch to pay court fees, which the Arvizos should be paying.

At least he's a free man.
I, for one, am very happy about it.

Edited by D-Cal, 14 June 2005 - 08:05 AM.

[Le Yoshi]

he was not guilty, story didnt make sence, just a mum who needs money so her kid makes up a lie, load of bs* if u tell me!

[sez318]

I agree with D-Cal, Jay and Donna. i never once believe MJ was guilty when there was no evidence.

[Polski Artysta]

Let's see... he's famous, he's got money. There ya go. That's all you need. I knew he was going to be found not guilty. My mom says he'd better watch out, or else someones going to assassinate him. She also says that it's really the parents fault in the first place for letting thier child go, plus, that one woman had so much bad history behind her...

[blackcode]

Even if he was guilty (which I dont think he was) he would have never been convicted becasuse of that mom was a huge factor. She was "held hostage" yet she was able to take a hot air ballon ride and get a bikini wax. And her past was a factor they were trying to do the same to Leno.

Yes I think Mike is screwed in the head. No I dont think he did it. I think he just still presents himself as a child. I guess he throws fits and crys all the time like a kid. Maybe he still sees himself as a kid and thats why he thinks slumber partys are still ok? All I know is I made about 60 bucks off this verdict. (10$ from 6 people) and thats all i care about.