CSS
#1
Posted 25 June 2005 - 02:47 PM
please can some of you tell me what you can do with CSS advantages and disadvantages
Thanks
#2
Posted 25 June 2005 - 03:02 PM
I have found that CSS is much easier to use if you want to stick to standards, as there are a lot of table things that aren't valid. Second, tables were designed for tabular data, which layouts aren't
I've also found that with CSS the pages load faster, because there is a lot less information you have to specify than with tables, and my coding looks a lot neater.
However, if you're planning on having visitors using Internet Explorer, you will run into some problems because of IE's horrible CSS support. However, this is rumored to be fixed in IE7. A bit of a googling will usually find the solution to wonky IE displays, and there are thousands of tricks out there to make IE work the way you want.
Also, it's a lot easier to read your coding later because instead of a mess of table data, there's just
<div id="container"> <div id="content">Content here</div> </div>
Obviously that is a bit simplified, but you get the gist And it just sounds sexy to say "I didn't use tables in this"
#3
Posted 25 June 2005 - 03:11 PM
With CSS you can modify every element on a page including scroll bars (IE only), h1 tags, h2 tags, hr tags, the body tag etc.
CSS also come with some advanced features such as inheritance. For example you can set a larger font size for <h1> tags that are nested inside of <p> tags, whereas all the other h1s will stay the same.
You should jump on the "CSS Bandwagon" as quickly as you can, soon tables are gonna be wiped into oblivion, never to be seen again (hopefully).
This book was absolutely brilliant for me when I started learning CSS at the beginning of this year.
#4
Posted 25 June 2005 - 03:26 PM
And with any luck iFrames will go with themYou should jump on the "CSS Bandwagon" as quickly as you can, soon tables are gonna be wiped into oblivion, never to be seen again (hopefully).
#5
Posted 25 June 2005 - 03:33 PM
We can only hope...And with any luck iFrames will go with themYou should jump on the "CSS Bandwagon" as quickly as you can, soon tables are gonna be wiped into oblivion, never to be seen again (hopefully).
#6
Posted 25 June 2005 - 03:41 PM
#7
Posted 26 June 2005 - 07:25 AM
sorry about the double post, but you wouldnt have seen it otherwise. forgive me.
#8
Posted 26 June 2005 - 09:31 AM
#9
Posted 26 June 2005 - 10:13 AM
god bless you
#10
Posted 26 June 2005 - 11:10 AM
#11
Posted 26 June 2005 - 02:02 PM
im definitely learnin now
#12
Posted 27 June 2005 - 03:20 PM
Now, go to File > Save as and save the page. Open it up again... without its CSS file.
Also, check out http://www.matsutaniamerica.com . Do the same thing w/that. For an added bonus, print any page out. Don't copy and paste it into a text document.. just Go to File > Print on any page.
CSS ftw
Edited by Phrozt, 18 July 2005 - 04:48 PM.
#13
Posted 06 July 2005 - 10:14 AM
THE place to learn CSS (no offense to P2L) is W3 Schools. There is an easy way to experment quickly with CSS in the examples.
Edited by Yertsivad, 06 July 2005 - 10:22 AM.
#14
Posted 06 July 2005 - 10:40 AM
KIWI
#15
Posted 06 July 2005 - 03:22 PM
#16
Posted 06 July 2005 - 04:16 PM
the new css/xhtml "bandwagon" is based entirely on the presumption that you want to change your layout constantly once its finished. 99% of sites don't changed once they are laid out.. with the rare exception of sites like the BBC, who change the layout of content but rarely change the look of the site
that being said, your site will validate either way, css/xhtml just takes alot more skill to do, which is why alot of people are doing it, as there are tonnes of ready made editors for tables at the moment and no proper editors for css
#17
Posted 06 July 2005 - 04:33 PM
Using tables for layouts is like using Photoshop for vector images, or Illustrator for rasterized images. Sure, it can be done, but you won't be able to achieve as much as you would if you used the proper tool.
#18
Posted 06 July 2005 - 04:45 PM
#19
Posted 06 July 2005 - 06:05 PM
Edited by Chip, 06 July 2005 - 06:09 PM.
#20
Posted 07 July 2005 - 02:38 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users