Jump to content


some of my latest sigs


9 replies to this topic

#1 CyreX

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 06:57 AM

ive really got into the style of multicoloring
tell me Watcha think?
Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

comments please...

#2 Armada

    P2L Jedi

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 591 posts
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 29 June 2005 - 07:00 AM

there quite nice but the text looks reallllly choppy dunno why :S

#3 CyreX

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 07:05 AM

Armada, on Jun 29 2005, 12:00 PM, said:

there quite nice but the text looks reallllly choppy dunno why :S
choppy? well now that you mentioned it... yeah it is a bit choopy (especialy the first one) i wonder why too :P

Edited by CyreX, 29 June 2005 - 07:06 AM.


#4 Proz0r

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 84 posts
  • Location:Belgium, Ypres
  • Interests:Women, beer, gaming, design,...

Posted 29 June 2005 - 08:06 AM

Nice sigs except for the text offcourse :D
Like it allready has been said, text is choppy. This could be because the Font itself is a choppy font, but in the first & second sig, it's because the font is a pixelfont. You can see the pixels coming :(
The third sig is nice, the text is choppy, but that's the font, it's meant to be choppy.

Ohh yeah, and one last thing: pixelfonts are meant to be small, so smaller your name in you sigs, it will be less hard to read.
first: 6/10
second: 6.5/10
third: 7.5/10

#5 Armada

    P2L Jedi

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 591 posts
  • Location:Scotland

Posted 29 June 2005 - 08:24 AM

yeah use a pixel font about 8px

#6 Urandor

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 13 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 08:38 AM

Proz0r, on Jun 29 2005, 01:06 PM, said:

Nice sigs except for the text offcourse :D
Like it allready has been said, text is choppy. This could be because the Font itself is a choppy font, but in the first & second sig, it's because the font is a pixelfont. You can see the pixels coming :(
The third sig is nice, the text is choppy, but that's the font, it's meant to be choppy.

Ohh yeah, and one last thing: pixelfonts are meant to be small, so smaller your name in you sigs, it will be less hard to read.
This arent pixelfonts, foxelfonts are visitor etc.
But try to set your text on smooth, that should help :(

#7 Proz0r

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 84 posts
  • Location:Belgium, Ypres
  • Interests:Women, beer, gaming, design,...

Posted 29 June 2005 - 09:32 AM

Oh :D
Didn't know that. Thx for telling me that Urandor :(
But if you would try to softer the typing in the first sig for example, wouldn't you get problems with the border around it ?

#8 CyreX

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 28 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 10:52 AM

oh well next time i will invent something :D

#9 Urandor

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 13 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 11:49 AM

Proz0r, on Jun 29 2005, 02:32 PM, said:

Oh :D
Didn't know that. Thx for telling me that Urandor :)
But if you would try to softer the typing in the first sig for example, wouldn't you get problems with the border around it ?
Do you mean the topleft text? ( That could be a pixeltext indeed, didn't even see those texts :( )
Pixelfonts should be typed while stinding on none to get the best effects and the bigger text ( For example this EtherLords text ) should be types with smooth

Sry Proz0r didn't see that text :(

#10 Proz0r

    Young Padawan

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 84 posts
  • Location:Belgium, Ypres
  • Interests:Women, beer, gaming, design,...

Posted 29 June 2005 - 01:03 PM

Np :)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users