Full Version: PNG vs JPG?
I say instead of having a 60kb limit, we should double that in order to allow for higher-quality png images. And this probably doesn't go here, but I don't know where it would go.
The reason the 60KB sig rule is there, is because P2L Has visitors on the site who are on 56k speeds. So you can imagine how hectic it would be if we had sigs of 120KB!
You can ask Donna or Faken, but i'm sure it's been asked many times before! The "Save for web" function in PS is ideal for Sigs, you don't lose hardly any quality and it saves at small sizes
http://www.pixel2life.com/contact if you want a second opinion
You can ask Donna or Faken, but i'm sure it's been asked many times before! The "Save for web" function in PS is ideal for Sigs, you don't lose hardly any quality and it saves at small sizes
http://www.pixel2life.com/contact if you want a second opinion
Tom?
is this because of the discussion in the other post??
is this because of the discussion in the other post??
QUOTE (Scythar @ Jun 27 2008, 07:08 PM) 
Tom?
is this because of the discussion in the other post??
is this because of the discussion in the other post??
Nooooo.... 
QUOTE (Sparkwire @ Jun 27 2008, 10:01 AM)
I say instead of having a 60kb limit, we should double that in order to allow for higher-quality png images. And this probably doesn't go here, but I don't know where it would go.
Just read what Tom wrote, the sig guidelines won't be changing.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.