NUgfx v1
Started by
Le Yoshi
, Mar 29 2006 09:58 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 March 2006 - 09:58 AM
Just designed myself a new site based it on the minimal vector style.
anyway what you lot think.
http://www.nugfx.co.uk/
c+c
anyway what you lot think.
http://www.nugfx.co.uk/
c+c
#2
Posted 29 March 2006 - 03:23 PM
Not bad,
but wrong section i am afraid...
but wrong section i am afraid...
#3
Posted 29 March 2006 - 06:11 PM
Moved.
#4
Posted 29 March 2006 - 09:38 PM
You mispell the word "pieces" all throughout the site. Also, it gets very irritating when I read the descriptions of your work, and for each one of them you start with, "This peice of work..."
#5
Posted 29 March 2006 - 10:12 PM
"d.o.b 04.12.1895"
Wow man, you are old.
Nice site and nice pieces of work, no real faults except some spelling errors. Try using spellcheck.
Wow man, you are old.
Nice site and nice pieces of work, no real faults except some spelling errors. Try using spellcheck.
#6
Posted 30 March 2006 - 12:20 AM
Errm I don't like your menu, orignal interface however.
#7
Posted 30 March 2006 - 12:50 AM
lol i first thought it was nug fx instead of nu gfx. anyway, nice site man. i like the simplicity of it, but it would look better if you made the graphics less choppy.
#8
Posted 30 March 2006 - 11:49 PM
I don't like the rollover on your menu buttons. And what is a 'beautyfly' I'd like to know?
But other than that I like the design, it's a nice and simple.
But other than that I like the design, it's a nice and simple.
Edited by Mercedez, 30 March 2006 - 11:50 PM.
#9
Posted 31 March 2006 - 04:14 AM
That's a nice site, love the colours
#10
Posted 31 March 2006 - 11:53 AM
I'd say you should make your preview images smaller. I have a 1920x1200 screen, and Im still having to scroll sideways to see all the artwork.
I have two reasons for saying this:
1) Image size is smaller, loads faster, less bandwidth.
2) You can see the entire piece of work, and take it all in as it is ment to be...not just one chunk of it.
I have two reasons for saying this:
1) Image size is smaller, loads faster, less bandwidth.
2) You can see the entire piece of work, and take it all in as it is ment to be...not just one chunk of it.
#11
Posted 31 March 2006 - 06:33 PM
i like it very nicely thought out... only thing is the white empty spaces..... like beside your nav in hte middle its all white and empty and at the bottom theirs a big chunck thast empty witch creates useless scrolling... other then that great work i love the colors and the design.... navs cool to me... original..
-Seb-
-Seb-
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users