Avatars: Bigger, Clearer, better.
#1
Posted 17 May 2005 - 03:58 PM
I was wondering why the avatar sizes were not 96x96? And if you could allow us to have 96x96 sized avatars?
#3
Posted 17 May 2005 - 04:02 PM
Who set that standard?proper 96x96 sized avatars
I think the avatars are just fine personally, design them to fit the space and they'll look perfect. If we increase the size, I think it would throw off the clean look of the design
#4
Posted 17 May 2005 - 05:22 PM
Who set that standard?
Mostly alot of other forums that I am a member of, have been a member of and have browse. Also having them at that size gives you a bit more space to create something.
It could just be me, but 64x64 just seems weird to me. Maybe it looks fine and all to you guys?
#5
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:10 PM
#6
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:21 PM
#7
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:35 PM
Seems perfect size to me.
I dont care about size now, its fine.
#8
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:36 PM
I dont know what your talking aboutsigs? lol avatars right? but yes i think these sizes are fine, 96x96 does look a bit too large
Also for sites like this which have a fixied width its best to have smaller images so the tables dont get messed up.
#9
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:39 PM
96x96 is not a standard size.I was wondering why avatar sizes are very small in the P2L Forums and not the proper 96x96 sized avatars. The max size here is to small to see proper avatar images and all that.
I was wondering why the avatar sizes were not 96x96? And if you could allow us to have 96x96 sized avatars?
Would you prefer we had larger avatars and smaller sig banners say 88x31
They will remain at 64x64 unless Faken changes & I cannot see that happening as majority are happy the way they are.
#10
Posted 18 May 2005 - 02:59 AM
#11
Posted 18 May 2005 - 04:28 AM
#12
Posted 18 May 2005 - 08:17 AM
#13
Posted 18 May 2005 - 10:17 AM
#14
Posted 18 May 2005 - 10:55 AM
Would you prefer we had larger avatars and smaller sig banners say 88x31 tongue.gif
That's quite a good idea
It'll save me a hell of a lot of time...
#15
Posted 18 May 2005 - 02:45 PM
i would be for it. i dont really like big sigs. but then again i like seeing the pics instead of just strait text.Would you prefer we had larger avatars and smaller sig banners say 88x31 tongue.gif
That's quite a good idea
It'll save me a hell of a lot of time...
#16
Posted 18 May 2005 - 11:18 PM
if a sig is too big it makes the page take too long to load, i dont care what a sig has in it, i care what the thread is about.
#17
Posted 18 May 2005 - 11:24 PM
Closing thread since its been answered.
If there is any changes to avatars in the near future it will be posted in News Section.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users