WARNING! Rotator sigs = Ban. Please read this.
#1
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:16 PM
ANYONE caught using an image rotator script in their signature will be banned on the spot for 1 week. No warning - no nothing. This will not be tolerated.
Continued abuse will result in the removal of everyone's ability to post images in their sigs and we'll keep it text based if necessary. I'm sure no one wants it to come to that, so let's clean it up guys. Static images only please.
Thanks,
Faken
#2
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:17 PM
#3
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:19 PM
I believe those are animated gifs... They rotate while just looking at it because it's actually a single animated image. If it rotates on refresh, then that is an image rotator and that will warrant a ban.ARE rotator sigs the things people generally use for there little hobby sigs?
Faken
#4
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:21 PM
Hope I've helped
#5
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:21 PM
#7
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:32 PM
Thank god I dont know how to write an image rotator script nor did i know what a rotator sig was until i read jaymz's post above lol.
#8
Posted 16 July 2005 - 10:58 PM
#9
Posted 16 July 2005 - 11:01 PM
Faken
#10
Posted 16 July 2005 - 11:05 PM
#11
Posted 16 July 2005 - 11:53 PM
a)Jumpy it is as the images load faster and I can read in peace
b)Less scrolling I have to do as there are genrally smaller sigs
c)The more enjoyable my experience is as I don't have these large image barrier that sometimes can be very annoying
Also it'll teach people to optimize and Save For Web
Just a suggestion.....
Edited by InFnit, 17 July 2005 - 12:00 AM.
#12
Posted 16 July 2005 - 11:58 PM
#13
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:04 AM
and just like an "area" limit -so instead of saying
can't be larger than 500 by 100
you can say no larger area of 50000 pixels squared - and no higher than 150px
(Gives more room for creativity)
#14
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:26 AM
wow, that would be awfull, if this happened i would have to personaly track down and give a firm beating to everyone who caused itContinued abuse will result in the removal of everyone's ability to post images in their sigs and we'll keep it text based if necessary.
#15
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:29 AM
Wait! What am I saying - we are not losing images!
#16
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:52 AM
But your right that code is annoying.
#17
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:52 AM
#18
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:53 AM
#19
Posted 17 July 2005 - 12:54 AM
#20
Posted 17 July 2005 - 01:06 AM
You can't read text behind the images so none of us know whats in that script safe or bad and the amount of viruses floating all over the web its just NOT safe, some browses force you to download the script if you try to view them.so what do these rotating images actually do bad to the site. do they slow it down, use bandwidth, or what? and about teh sig size limit...60 kb is fine, i find it hard to get under 60 sometimes...especially PNG since u cant adjust quality on PNG. I do agree however that a sig above 60kb would be a bit much, and huge 500 kb animated sigs bug me.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users