Adobe Buys Macromedia!
#21
Posted 23 April 2005 - 10:45 PM
#22
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:28 AM
#23
Posted 27 April 2005 - 06:58 AM
#24
Posted 29 April 2005 - 10:49 PM
This is gonna be awsome
~butters
#25
Posted 01 May 2005 - 02:47 AM
Fireworks also work with vectors.MOre important would be Illustrator/Flash since they both work with vectors
#26
Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:20 AM
but adobe will probly kill off fireworks because illustrator is more advanced...and it has a more relevant name lolFireworks also work with vectors.MOre important would be Illustrator/Flash since they both work with vectors
#27 _*adrian_*
Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:57 AM
-Adrian
#28
Posted 09 May 2005 - 09:40 AM
I liked things the way they were and I really hope Adobe won't change the Macromedia team in any way. If they want to make money off their backs, fine! Just let Macromedia continue their marvellous work they did up so far.
My 50 cents
#29
Posted 09 May 2005 - 10:18 AM
The possibilities though are near endless. I hope they take us all into design heaven.
Where they actually take us is their call.
#30
Posted 10 May 2005 - 07:56 AM
umm no, it means Adobe owns Macromedia, Mac is owned by Apple computerswow, so, what does this mean? Adobe OWNS Mac.?
#31
Posted 10 May 2005 - 01:40 PM
I think he was using mac. as an abbreviation for Macromedia.umm no, it means Adobe owns Macromedia, Mac is owned by Apple computerswow, so, what does this mean? Adobe OWNS Mac.?
By the way, edit your sig, you can only have one image that is under 60Kb. Read the rules before and admin has to tell you to.
#32
Posted 13 May 2005 - 10:48 AM
#33
Posted 19 May 2005 - 05:21 PM
which means adobe own a lot of usAdobe OWNS the design world now!
#34
Posted 19 May 2005 - 07:11 PM
#35
Posted 20 May 2005 - 01:33 AM
#36
Posted 22 May 2005 - 12:57 PM
lmao, true but adobe wont make a new version cos of photoshop and illustrator which are like twice as good as the macromedia image editing rangeNut uve already got fireworks,it doesent mean ur prog is gonna stop wrkin
#37 _*neapra_*
Posted 25 May 2005 - 08:00 AM
whats the big loss photoshop is better, now if they combine photoshop with flash then like some of you have said its the ultimate program for us. Anyone who prefers fireworks over photoshop needs to look at the work created by people with fireworks then look at photoshop.
i am glad adobe has bought macromedia. nobody is gonna lose there jobs and so what if they did i dont lose my job that migth sound selfish but its true adobe owns macromedia now they can do what they like....
#38
Posted 25 May 2005 - 10:08 AM
#39
Posted 25 May 2005 - 01:01 PM
this is a pretty silly comment on the topic to be honestfrom what i hear fireworks is just the n00b version of photoshop
whats the big loss photoshop is better, now if they combine photoshop with flash then like some of you have said its the ultimate program for us. Anyone who prefers fireworks over photoshop needs to look at the work created by people with fireworks then look at photoshop.
i am glad adobe has bought macromedia. nobody is gonna lose there jobs and so what if they did i dont lose my job that migth sound selfish but its true adobe owns macromedia now they can do what they like....
both fireworks and photoshop have their up points and are roughly the same program
combining something like flash with photoshop in the same program wouldn't be a good move as they aren't really related, photoshop is for graphic work and flash is for animation, imageready might be a better solution to combine with flash
as for the jobs thing, people are deffinatly going to lose jobs
#40
Posted 02 June 2005 - 07:00 AM
EDIT: I just read that 'Jay' said about ImageReady+Flash being better, but I totally disagree. I really cannot stand ImageReady, I much prefer Flash, it's SO much better. But flash needs more graphical options, ones that Photoshop has. That's why I think Flash&Ps would be best together
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users